The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.This event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implant surgeon is: (b)(6).(b)(4).The complaint device is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a problem analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a pfr kit- pinnacle, posterior device was implanted into the patient during a vaginal hysterectomy and mesh enhanced uterosacral spinous fixation; cystocele repair; and cystoscopy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2011 for the treatment of pelvic relaxation.On (b)(6) 2013, the patient presented with dropped bladder, a symptomatic cystocele, and mesh erosion.On (b)(6) 2013, the patient presented with the same complaint and vaginal spotting.She had elevated mesh with erosion in the patient's left upper vaginal apex.Subsequently, the plan was to offer her an excision of the mesh that was eroded and anterior repair with sutures.This report was originally submitted via asr.Report identification number: a00480143, submission period: september 1, 2014 to october 31, 2014, asr exemption number: e2013036, pro code: otp.
|