• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP; BASEPLATE, GLENOID HA-COAT, RSP, 6.5MM X 30MM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP; BASEPLATE, GLENOID HA-COAT, RSP, 6.5MM X 30MM Back to Search Results
Model Number 508-32-104
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Paralysis (1997)
Event Date 01/18/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as broken screw.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 3 months and 3 weeks apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were returned for examination and the device evaluation anticipated but not yet begun at djo surgical.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to broken screw.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery - patient has a paralyzed right arm, partial fused back and fused left wrist.He solely uses left arm to lift themselves.He had broken the 6.5mm screw on baseplate.The baseplate, glenoid head and all four locking screws pulled out of glenoid.The remaining screw of the baseplate was also extracted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as broken screw.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 3 months and 3 weeks apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were returned for examination and the device evaluation anticipated but not yet begun at djo surgical.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to broken screw.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery - patient has a paralyzed right arm, partial fused back and fused left wrist.He solely uses left arm to lift themselves.He had broken the 6.5mm screw on baseplate.The baseplate, glenoid head and all four locking screws pulled out of glenoid.The remaining screw of the baseplate was also extracted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RSP
Type of Device
BASEPLATE, GLENOID HA-COAT, RSP, 6.5MM X 30MM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758 5445
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758 5445
Manufacturer Contact
kiersten soderman
9800 metric blvd
austin, TX 78758-5445
MDR Report Key13479967
MDR Text Key285320758
Report Number1644408-2022-00150
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PHX
UDI-Device Identifier00888912024754
UDI-Public(01)00888912024754
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K051075
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number508-32-104
Device Catalogue Number508-32-104
Device Lot Number866C2908
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
506-03-114 LOT 831C1937; 506-03-118 LOT 832C1777; 506-03-118 LOT 832C1787; 506-03-118 LOT 832C1788; 508-00-032 LOT 855C2346; 508-32-101 LOT 862C3453
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight78 KG
-
-