• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN CLOSUREFAST CATHETER; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN CLOSUREFAST CATHETER; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCES Back to Search Results
Device Problem No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Ulcer (2274); Impaired Healing (2378)
Event Date 01/12/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Event date reflects article published date.A comparison of cyanoacrylate glue and radiofrequency ablation techniques in the treatment of superficial venous reflux in ceap 6 patients journal of vascular surgery: venous and lymphatic disorders (2021) 9(5):1215-1221 10.1016/j.Jvsv.2020.12.082.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A journal article was submitted detailing a study which compared the rates of venous wound healing between two techniques of superficial vein closure, venaseal and closurefast.A retrospective review was performed of patients who had undergone closure of truncal veins within a 5-year defined time.119 patients were included in the study.119 limbs treated where 68 were treated with closurefast and 51 with venaseal.The technical success rate was 100% for all veins ablated as confirmed by the post-procedure duplex ultrasound examination.No device-related complications were reported.No postoperative dvts occurred in our patient cohort.Wound healing was reported to be significantly shorter in the venaseal group as compared with the closurefast group (43 vs 104 days respectively).Two patients undergoing rfa had developed a post-procedure limb infection, both treated with antibiotics.Ulcer recurrence was reported as 19.3% overall with 22.1% in the closurefast group and 13.7% in the venaseal group.No repeated ablations were necessary because of recanalization of the target vein, and no treatment failures were identified during the study period.The author concludes that both closurefast and venaseal are safe and effective treatments to eliminate truncal venous insufficiency.Venaseal showed a superior time to wound healing compared with closurefast in both large and small ulcers.Venaseal-treated ulcers healed an average of 2.5 months more quickly than did the rfa-treated ulcers.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CLOSUREFAST CATHETER
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCES
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708734
MDR Report Key13509522
MDR Text Key289487174
Report Number2183870-2022-00051
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K111887
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/03/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-