• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA PK 4.5MM W/2 UB -WHT &BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA PK 4.5MM W/2 UB -WHT &BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 72202595
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/23/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, during a surgery the twinfix screw slipped from the bone hole.The procedure was successfully completed without a significant delay using a back-up device.No other complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and applicable tests were appropriately specified.A material certificate of analysis was required for the raw material.A review of the customer provided image found labelling confirming the product identification information.The anchor is on the shaft of the device, but the condition of the device cannot be determined from the image.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The anchor is on the shaft of the device, and there is a fracture in the threads.When the anchor is removed from the device, the sutures had been cut, and the prongs on the distal end of the shaft was deformed.There is debris on the device.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A functional evaluation could not be performed due to the condition in which the device was received.The fracture in the anchor could affect the ability of the device to be secured properly within the insertion site.If any fractured pieces were retained the twinfix anchor is implantable, biocompatibility is not an issue.It is unknown if the possible retained fragments will migrate and there is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.No further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and applicable tests were appropriately specified.A material certificate of analysis was required for the raw material.A review of the customer provided image found labelling confirming the product identification information.The anchor is on the shaft of the device, but the condition of the device cannot be determined from the image.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The anchor is on the shaft of the device, and there is a fracture in the threads.When the anchor is removed from the device, the sutures had been cut, and the prongs on the distal end of the shaft was deformed.There is debris on the device.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A functional evaluation could not be performed due to the condition in which the device was received.The fracture in the anchor could affect the ability of the device to be secured properly within the insertion site.If any fractured pieces were retained the twinfix anchor is implantable, biocompatibility is not an issue.It is unknown if the possible retained fragments will migrate and there is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.No further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TWINFIX ULTRA PK 4.5MM W/2 UB -WHT &BL
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13543660
MDR Text Key285694876
Report Number1219602-2022-00235
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
UDI-Device Identifier03596010647467
UDI-Public03596010647467
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K093228
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/16/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number72202595
Device Catalogue Number72202595
Device Lot Number2068975
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/20/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age45 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight68 KG
-
-