The complaint as described by the customer "we ran a cardiac arrest this morning and got rosc.We attempted to pace due to rate.We remembered this time to put a 3 lead attached to the ls, switched it to fixed mode, then increased the rate to 70-80, then attempted to set current.However, it would not allow us to increase beyond 35 ma.We switched it to demand, yet it still did not work".
|
The complaint as described by the customer "we ran a cardiac arrest this morning and got rosc.We attempted to pace due to rate.We remembered this time to put a 3 lead attached to the ls, switched it to fixed mode, then increased the rate to 70-80, then attempted to set current.However, it would not allow us to increase beyond 35 ma.We switched it to demand, yet it still did not work".The customer received replacement device.The failure device log files and rescue files have been sent to the manufacturer(schiller) for investigation.Investigation report is attached.The patient did not die during intervention, but 9 hrs later in icu.There is no information about the clinical status of the patient after being transferred to the icu in the morning.The analysis of the log files showed that the pacer had stopped because the impedance of the pads were too high.So there was no device hardware failure happened.The full disclosure report from the device is not available.The investigation is inconclusive as necessary information - full disclosure file could not be obtained by customer service department despite at least three (3) separate attempts.Based on the available information, the assumption is that the issue might be related to the pads.Nissha medical technologies - the legal manufacturer of the pads was informed by schiller about the latest complaints involving tempus ls pads.
|