|
Catalog Number 310.534 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 01/20/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Investigation summary: the complaint device (drill bit ø2 w/marking l110/85 2flute) was not received for investigation.A photo investigation was performed based on the photos provided.The photo was reviewed, and the complaint condition can be confirmed.After review of the photo provided, a fracture of the drill bit ø2 can be observed.With the given information is not possible to confirm an embedded device issue.This complaint is confirmed as a photo inspection does show the broken drill.A definite assignable root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.As the device was not returned, and as-received condition could not be assessed and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed (based on the images) that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 310.534, lot: 4l69885, manufacturing site: (b)(4), supplier: (b)(4), release to warehouse date: 21-may-2019.Expiration date: n/a a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished article lot and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from depuy synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a procedure on (b)(6) 2022 a 2.0mm drill bit broke in bone.It was not possible to remove the broken fragment.There is no plan for the removal of the broken fragment.Also the drill bit 2.5 is bent.Surgeon used another device to finish the case.Procedure was completed without any surgical delay.Patient outcome is reported as okay.This report is for one (1) 2.0mm drill bit w/depth mark qc/110mm.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthese is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthese has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthese or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthese, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h6: the device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A product investigation was completed: visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the tip of the drill bit has broken, the broken fragment presents involvement in the patient but is necessary more information to determinate this event.No other problems were reported.A dimensional inspection was not performed due to post manufacturing damage.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to excessive/unintended forces.The current and manufactured to drawings were reviewed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|