• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC13
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Only event year known: 2022.Lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: please confirm, the device was explanted as scheduled (b)(6) 2022? yes.Were there any intra-operative complications during implant? no.Was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes.Please specify the symptoms the patient was experiencing prior to implant (gerd reflux, dysphagia, pain during eating, etc., )? gerd.Had the patient had any diagnostic testing done to address the symptoms they experienced while the device was implanted? yes.If yes, what diagnostic testing was completed? egd with dilation and upper gi can you share the results of the diagnostic tests? no.Do they have an autoimmune disease? no.Has the patient been prescribed medication by a doctor (not over the counter medication)? yes.If yes, what is the doctor prescribed medication? prednisone.Are they currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? no.Does the patient have any of the allergies to metals? no.If so, what test have been done to test for metal allergies.N/a.At the time of removal, was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? yes.Have the symptoms resolved since the device was explanted? the patient said they¿ve eased but aren¿t completely gone.Was mesh used at time of implant? no.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a linx device will be explanted due to severe chest pains.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/9/2022.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.No further investigation will be conducted on this complaint as the device is found to meet the specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 24043, and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 13B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview 55126
6107428552
MDR Report Key13579451
MDR Text Key290463622
Report Number3008766073-2022-00034
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005332
UDI-Public00855106005332
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/22/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2022
Device Model NumberLXMC13
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC13
Device Lot Number24043
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/22/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/14/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-