• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ELUVIA DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ELUVIA DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number 24653
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Numbness (2415); Restenosis (4576)
Event Date 08/01/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient identifier: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
(b)(6) clinical trial.It was reported that an in-stent restenosis occurred.The subject was enrolled in the eminent clinical study on (b)(6) 2018 and the index procedure was performed on the same day.The target lesion was located in the left distal superficial femoral artery (sfa) involving the proximal popliteal artery and was 100% stenosed.The lesion was 50mm long with a proximal reference vessel diameter of 5.5mm and a distal reference vessel diameter of 5.5mm.The lesion was classified as a tasc ii a lesion.Treatment of the target lesion was performed with pre-dilatation followed by a placement of a 6mm x 60mm eluvia drug-eluting vascular stent system.After post dilatation, the residual stenosis was 0%.On (b)(6) 2018, the subject was discharged with antiplatelet therapy.On (b)(6) 2020, 614 days post index procedure, duplex ultrasound performed revealed loss of amplitude on the left side up to the popliteal artery with moderate in-stent stenosis at the proximal popliteal stent with subsequently high pulsatile monophasic amplitudes.The subject was diagnosed with an in-stent restenosis in the left popliteal artery.On (b)(6) 2021, 1023 days post index procedure, the subject presented to the clinic with chief complaints of progressive pain the left calf, depending on exertion, for about 4 - 5 weeks.The subject also complained of feeling of numbness in the toes after walking a distance of 300 - 400 meters, paresthesia in the toe region and increasing impairment in the day-to-day life.Walking test performed showed feeling of pressure at the left calf after walking a distance of 24 meters, tugging up to the thigh on the left side after walking 56 meters, and progressive pain in the left calf and slightly at the left thigh after walking 113 meters.Abi was 0.71 on the left.On the same day, photoplethysmography performed revealed missing strong acral volume pulse curves at d1 and d2 and indication of ventricular premature contraction at d3-d5.Based on the symptoms and diagnostic findings, the subject was diagnosed with an in-stent restenosis in the left leg.The subject was recommended to undergo interventional procedure at a later date.On (b)(6) 2021, 1050 days post index procedure, the subject was presented to the clinic for planned interventional procedure.Walking test revealed pressure at the left calf after walking a distance of 20 meters and progressive pain in the left calf after walking 54 meters.On (b)(6) 2021, 1051 days post index procedure, pelvic and leg angiography performed revealed unremarkable sfa and filiform in-stent stenosis only starts at the popliteal p1 segment treated in the left side with a stent followed by unremarkable popliteal artery in to the p2/p3 segments and complete trifurcation.The target lesion was located in the left distal sfa involving the popliteal artery and had a reference diameter of 5.55mm.The lesion was treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using a 4mm x 40mm plain old balloon angioplasty and a 5mm x 80mm drug eluting balloon to treat beyond the borders of the stent.Post procedure, there were no complications or thrombus noted.On (b)(6) 2021, the duplex ultrasound performed revealed, patent femoropopliteal territory, wall irregularities in the distal femoral and popliteal regions.There was no evidence of relevant residual stenosis and biphasic amplitudes in the distal popliteal region in the left side.On the same day, photoplethysmography performed showed strong acral volume pulse curves with difference between the sides in favor of the left at d4/d5 on both sides.Walking test performed at 3 km/ hour + 12% revealed s1 and s2 were not achieved and ended after 150 meters due to dyspnea.Treadmill test performed showed significant improvement in walking distance.On (b)(6) 2021, the event was considered to be recovered/resolved and the subject was discharged on the same day with the advice of dual antiplatelet therapy.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELUVIA DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key13590572
MDR Text Key286050924
Report Number2134265-2022-01134
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/24/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Model Number24653
Device Catalogue Number24653
Device Lot Number0022441780
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/04/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other; Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-