• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 71335556
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Joint Dislocation (2374)
Event Date 02/04/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, after thr surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced dislocation due to the components being placed in a sub-optimal position.This adverse event was solved by revision surgery to explant the complete system on (b)(6) 2022.The physician revised an r3 3 hole acet shell 56mm.The current health status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after thr surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced dislocation due to the components being placed in a sub-optimal position.This adverse event was solved by revision surgery to explant the complete system on (b)(6) 2022.The physician revised an r3 3 hole acet shell 56mm.The current health status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, he patient had a thr with the r3 system and two days later had a revision due to dislocation.It was noted via the attachments that no further clinical documentation is available.Therefore based on insufficient information, a thorough medical investigation cannot be performed.However, we are unable to rule out a procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported dislocation as it was noted that the components were placed in a suboptimal position.The surgical technique states that the final position of the acetabular component should be approximately 45 degrees of abduction and 20 degrees of anteversion or at the surgeon¿s desired acetabular cup orientation.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A review of the instructions for use for this device reveal in the warnings and precautions, intraoperative section, that proper positioning of the components is important to minimize impingement which could lead to early failure, premature wear, device related noise, and/or dislocation, all of which may lead to revision surgery.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13591625
MDR Text Key286062374
Report Number1020279-2022-00851
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRA
UDI-Device Identifier03596010598264
UDI-Public03596010598264
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K070756
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/24/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number71335556
Device Catalogue Number71335556
Device Lot Number18CW00017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/24/2022
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-