The device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, he patient had a thr with the r3 system and two days later had a revision due to dislocation.It was noted via the attachments that no further clinical documentation is available.Therefore based on insufficient information, a thorough medical investigation cannot be performed.However, we are unable to rule out a procedural variance as a contributing factor to the reported dislocation as it was noted that the components were placed in a suboptimal position.The surgical technique states that the final position of the acetabular component should be approximately 45 degrees of abduction and 20 degrees of anteversion or at the surgeon¿s desired acetabular cup orientation.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A review of the instructions for use for this device reveal in the warnings and precautions, intraoperative section, that proper positioning of the components is important to minimize impingement which could lead to early failure, premature wear, device related noise, and/or dislocation, all of which may lead to revision surgery.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|