This report includes a theoretical investigation since no product was returned to the manufacturer.It was reported that the user used the brush "a little longer than the recommended time frame", which means more than max 30 days, according to the ifu.Event description is interpreted that the brush head was detached during cleaning of the voice prosthesis.Unknown which voice prothesis that was used (part of follow-up questions that hs not been answered).Serious injury: no.Medical intervention: no.Residual effect: no.Discussion: the brush head of the provox brush consists of nylon filaments as bristles, twisted metal wire (diameter: 0.65mm, stainless steel) that is injection molded inside a pp plastic shaft or handle, and a pp-plastic tip on top of the brush head.A disconnect between the twisted metal and the shaft is very unlikely based on that the brush head (stainless steel wire) is injection molded into the handle.The most likely point of breakage is the actual twisted metal wire if the brush head has been bent extensively back and forth.This stainless steel wire has its breaking point at 758 n/mm^2 on average, making it very resilient to mechanical forces.It takes repeated damage to the material (such as bending it back and forth repeatedly) to weaken an subsequently break the material.The maximum forces applied to the brush during a cleaning procedure are at 13.7n (source: pf057-07, max.Esophageal flange strength).The chances of dislocating the voice prosthesis while cleaning are high when applying more than 13.7n of force.Therefore, the customer would have dislocated his vp before applying enough force to damage the brush by normal usage only.Furthermore, the average force needed to pull the brush head out of the brush handle is average 193n (stdev 18) for provox brush ref 7204 ((b)(4)).It takes in average 65 times to bend the steel wire 90 degrees back and forth before it breaks and fall off ((b)(4)).Bending of brush head is not allowed according to illustration in the ifu.Taking all those facts in consideration, it is highly likely that the brush was damaged prior to usage as it is not likely that the medical-grade steel wire will break during a standard cleaning procedure.The applied forces are just too small to damage steel.Conclusion/action: based on previous complaint experiences of broken brush heads, and the fact that the ifu has not been followed regarding device lifetime max 30 days, the most likely scenario is that the brush head has been bent by the user.Note: due to confidentiality reasons, the patient's name is not entered as the initial reporter.Instead, the sales representative's name is used.
|