Catalog Number UNK_THERMOCOOL SF NAV |
Device Problem
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Stroke/CVA (1770); Transient Ischemic Attack (2109); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
Event Date 08/15/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: pillarisetti j, reddy m, vodapally m, annapureddy t, molugu m, atkins d, bommana s, pimentel r, dendi r, lakkireddy d.Comparison of peri-procedural anticoagulation with rivaroxaban and apixaban during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.Indian pacing electrophysiol j.2020 nov-dec;20(6):261-264.Doi: 10.1016/j.Ipej.2020.08.002.Epub 2020 aug 15.Pmid: 32810538; pmcid: pmc7691779.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because no lot number was provided by the customer.Literature article cannot be attached as the electronic file size is too large.Manufacturer's ref #: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: pillarisetti j, reddy m, vodapally m, annapureddy t, molugu m, atkins d, bommana s, pimentel r, dendi r, lakkireddy d.Comparison of peri-procedural anticoagulation with rivaroxaban and apixaban during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.Indian pacing electrophysiol j.2020 nov-dec;20(6):261-264.Doi: 10.1016/j.Ipej.2020.08.002.Epub 2020 aug 15.Pmid: 32810538; pmcid: pmc7691779.Objective/methods/study data:prospective studies on rivaroxaban and apixaban have shown the safety and efficacy of direct anticoagulation agents (doac)s used peri-procedurally during radiofrequency ablation (rfa) of atrial fibrillation (af).We thus sought to compare the two agents in the peri procedural setting with regards to bleeding and thromboembolic complications.Data was obtained from a prospective observational registry maintained at one academic institution where a large volume of atrial fibrillation ablations are performed every year.There were a total of 358 patients (n ¼ 56 on apixaban and n ¼ 302 on rivaroxaban).There were no differences in baseline characteristics between both groups.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events: 3.5-mm open irrigated tip catheter (thermocool, biosense webster inc.Concomitant other biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: lasso, biosense webster inc., concomitant non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: spiral, st.Jude medical.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions: qty: 5; one patient had a tia and one patient had an ischemic stroke in the rivaroxaban group in 60 days; pericardial effusion between both groups (one patient in the apixaban group (1.7%) and two in the rivaroxaban group (0.6%)) with p ¼ 0.4.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|