• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GF-UCT180
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fever (1858); Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It is reported in the literature titled ¿outcomes of eus guided transluminal gallbladder drainage in patients without cholecystitis¿, patients in both study groups experienced adverse effects during or after procedures using an evis exera ii ultrasound gastrovideoscope.Study aim: cholecystectomy is the gold standard for most gallbladder related disease.However, many patients with gallbladder disease are poor surgical candidates.Current nonsurgical gallbladder drainage (gbd) methods include percutaneous cholecystostomy and endoscopic ultrasound guided transluminal gbd (eus gbd).Outcomes for eus gbd for the treatment of non-cholecystitis (nc) gallbladder disease have not been defined.Study method: cases were identified using procedural data from a quaternary academic hospital for endoscopic procedures from 2015 to 2020.Patients who underwent eus gbd for acute cholecystitis, biliary colic, gallstone pancreatitis, and secondary prevention of gallstone disease were included.Results: fifty five cases of eus gbd were identified over the 5 year study period.Forty one cases were performed for acute cholecystitis, and 15 were performed for other nc indications.Indications for nc drainage included primary treatment of symptomatic biliary colic and secondary prevention of gallstone pancreatitis and choledocholithiasis.There was no statistically significant difference in complications, mortality, or reintervention requirements.There was a 13.3% rate of immediate complications in the nc group, which were all medically managed.Conclusions: eus gbd appears to be a safe and effective way to manage gallstone disease in nonsurgical candidates with nc gallbladder related disease.Overall complications and readmissions were infrequent.Complication rates were similar to those published in patients who underwent eus gbd for acute cholecystitis.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the eus-gbd-nc group.(this report) case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the eus-gbd-c group.In the eus-gbd-nc group, there was a 13.3% rate of immediate complications among nc patients, which were due to postprocedural fever (n = 1) and persistent ruq pain (n = 1); the patient with fever was medically managed, though the patient with persistent ruq pain underwent ercp with sphincterotomy on postprocedure day 3.There was no report of olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this literature.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
MDR Report Key13756183
MDR Text Key287103866
Report Number2951238-2022-00355
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODG
UDI-Device Identifier04953170356339
UDI-Public04953170356339
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/14/2022,03/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGF-UCT180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/14/2022
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/14/2022
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received03/14/2022
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-