SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN R3 METAL LINER IMPL; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Biocompatibility (2886)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Arthralgia (2355); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
|
Event Date 10/17/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that on literature review "the early to medium-term results of a hemispherical, porous coated acetabular shell with multiple different bearing combinations are excellent with the exception of metal-on-metal", one (1) patient had pain and metallosis after a tha while using r3 acetabular shell and high offset porous-coated synergy stem.The events were treated by a revision surgery 6 years post-operatively.Patients¿ outcome is unknown.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).Thompson, z., khoshbin, a., ward, s., waddell, j.P., & atrey, a.(2020).The early-to medium-term results of a hemispherical, porous coated acetabular shell with multiple different bearing combinations are excellent with the exception of metal-on-metal.International orthopaedics, 44(12), 2537-2543.Doi: doi.Org/10.1007/s00264-020-04817-1.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: it was reported that on literature review one patient had pain and metallosis after a tha while using an r3 acetabular shell and high offset porous-coated synergy stem.The events were treated by a revision surgery 6 years post-operatively.The patients outcome is unknown.No further information is available.No devices have been returned.Without definitive lot numbers, a complete complaint history review cannot be performed for the devices involved.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record review, device labelling and ifu review could not be performed.A risk management review could not be performed as the devices involved have been phased out of the market.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A review of prior escalation actions was completed with the available information.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible; no further escalation actions required.Without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images are required.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the reported complaint.The investigation remains inconclusive and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Additionally, specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault cannot be provided due to the insufficient information.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on the results of this investigation, the need for corrective or preventative action is not indicated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|