|
Catalog Number CLSO-8.5-12 |
Device Problem
Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/16/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
|
Event Description
|
Customers tried to insert the clso-8.5-12 ((b)(4)) into the bile duct compatible with oa-8.5.However, the white proximal wire port of the inner catheter was detached from the internal induction catheter.((b)(4)) this has occurred frequently in recent, and customers have requested inspection of joints, and confirmation of product changes during production process.Did any section of the device remain inside the patient body? no.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedure(s)? no.Were there any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.Did the product cause or contribute to the adverse effect(s)? no.
|
|
Event Description
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation: 1 x clso-8.5-12 of unknown lot number was not returned to cirl for evaluation.This file is capturing the difficult advancement of the clso-8.5-12.This file is related to another file which captures the white proximal wire port of the inner catheter detaching from the internal induction catheter.(rpn: oa-8.5).Document review including ifu review: prior to distribution all clso-8.5-12 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for the clso-8.5-12 device could not be completed as the lot number is unknown.It should be noted that according to the instructions for use, ifu0045-7, the following is stated in the notes section, ¿visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working conditions, do not use.¿ there is no evidence to suggest that the use did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined as the device was not returned for evaluation.A possible root cause could be attributed to user technique where excessive force was applied to place the stent and overcome the resistance that was encountered.Summary: complaint is based on customer testimony.According to the information reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|