It was reported that, after a thr surgery, had been performed on (b)(6) 2010, the patient experienced infection and swelling.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022 to exchange the head.Current health status of patient is unknown.
|
H10: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, this case reports that approximately 12 years post tha the patient had had a revision due to infection and swelling.Per case details, the surgeon says the devices were not defective.It was communicated via e-mail that no additional information is available.Without clinically relevant information for evaluation, the clinical root cause of the reported infection and swelling cannot be definitively concluded.Further patient impact beyond the reported revision could not be assessed.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, joint tightness, material in use, patient reaction or loss of sterility.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|