|
Model Number AB9U14080090 |
Device Problems
Compatibility Problem (2960); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 03/02/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Physician was attempting to use an abre self-expanding stent along with non-medtronic 9fr and 0.035" glidewire during procedure to treat a none calcified soft tissue in the right proximal inominate brachiocephalic vein.The vessel was severely tortuous.The vessel diameter and lesion length were 12mm and 6mm respectively.There was no damage noted to packaging.There was no issue noted when removing the device from hoop/tray.The device was prepped per ifu with no issues identified.The lesion was pre dilated with a 12x40 device.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.There was no resistance encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was used during withdrawal.It was reported that a non-medtronic 14mm x 40mm balloon was used for post dilatation of deployed 14 x 80 abre stent.No issues whatsoever with abre deployed perfectly.Issue was with the post dilatation balloons.Physician was not using an endoflater, used a syringe and take down balloon.Balloon got hung up on struts and physician had to twist and tug on pta catheter to dislodge.Physician stated no issue with stent - just with the balloon getting hung up on struts.Physician deployed a 12 x 40 non medtronic device, once balloon was removed and decided to reline stent with another 14 x 80 stent abreand and used a 12 x 40 non-medtronic balloon to post dilate.Good outcome and physician was satisfied.Physician had to use two 14 x 80 abre stents to complete the case.There was no patient injury.Physician aware off-label use of the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the initial abre stent was not damaged before or after initial implantation.It appears that balloon did not fully deflate and balloon got hung up on struts and during attempt to free balloon from stent physician had to twist and tug on pta catheter to dislodge thereby damaging abre struts.The initial abre stent did not move from its intended zone due to balloon interaction.No perforations of vessel noted.Undetermined if there was any other vessel damage, only section of stent strut impacted.No issues with patient currently.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Image analysis three images were provided for evaluation.Image one is of the balloon.Biologics can be observed on the balloon.The balloon material appears to be deformed.Image two and three are cine images of the stent.In these images you can see the wire is loaded through the stent and the stent appears to be deformed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|