• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND VENA SEAL CLOSURE SYSTEM; AGENT, OCCLUDING, VASCULAR, PERMANENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND VENA SEAL CLOSURE SYSTEM; AGENT, OCCLUDING, VASCULAR, PERMANENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Cellulitis (1768); Erythema (1840); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Pain (1994); Phlebitis (2004); Local Reaction (2035); Transient Ischemic Attack (2109); Paresthesia (4421); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 02/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A journal article was submitted detailing a retrospective study which aimed to demonstrate the relationship between healing active ulcers and ablation between different modalities of ablation.146 patients were included in the study.Patients were treated with venaseal, rfa, or evlt.The primary outcome was the time to ulcer healing.Secondary outcomes were the rate of recurrence, compliance with compression, and participation in a wound clinic.The study showed a non-significant difference in days to ulcer healing post-intervention between ablative techniques.A similar, non-significant trend was observed for ulcer recurrence, with a rate of 35.7% for venaseal 26.7% for evlt, and 23.1% for rfa.Few local and systemic complications occurred.The most common complication was dvt after procedure.The same non-significant trend occurred with dvt following procedure, being observed in 12.5% of patient¿s treated with venaseal, 9.5% in the evlt group and 6.5% in rfa cases.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Title: longer healing times, higher recurrence rates, and increased incidence of dvt following cyanoacrylate ablation for active venous ulcerations author: lindsey korepta, matthew ward journal: annals of vascular surgery year: 2022 vol/issue: 79 ref: doi.Org/10.1016/j.Avsg.2021.12.057.Date of event: date of publication.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A2 age: mean age a3 sex: majority sex a5a ethnicity: majority ethnicity a5b race: majority race additional information: systemic complications included allergic reactions, deep venous thrombosis (dvt), pulmonary embolism (pe), transient ischemic attack (tia), stroke (cva), and death.There were no allergic reactions, pe, tia, or cva observed in the 1-year post-operative for this patient cohort.Leg specific complications were recorded during a follow-up period of 1- year, including bleeding, pain, blistering, erythema, paresthesia, superficial thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, endovascular heat induced thrombosis (ehit), endovenous glue induced thrombosis (egit), and ulcer recurrence.There were limited numbers of other minor local complications observed.Bleeding, pain, blistering, erythematous skin changes, paresthesia, superficial thrombophlebitis, and cellulitis were also nearly 0% across all groups.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENA SEAL CLOSURE SYSTEM
Type of Device
AGENT, OCCLUDING, VASCULAR, PERMANENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key13860517
MDR Text Key287673495
Report Number9612164-2022-01113
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PJQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/01/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/23/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/09/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/08/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-