• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAPTIVATOR EMR; ENDOSCOPE AND/OR ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAPTIVATOR EMR; ENDOSCOPE AND/OR ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 02/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Boston scientific became aware of multiple events involving captivator emr devices through the article "multi-band mucosectomy for neoplasia with barret's esophagus: in vivo comparison between two different devices" written by marco spadaccini, et al.According to the literature, the aim to the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two different types of band ligator: duette and captivator emr device for neoplasia in patients with barreett's esophagus during multi-band mucosectomy procedure.The randomized controlled study was carried out on seventy-six patients (38 per group).The two groups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics.During the procedure minor bleeding was recorded in 4 patients treated with captivator emr device.All cases were managed endoscopically during the same procedure by using conventional hemostatic tools not requiring the interruption of the procedure.One patient experienced post-procedural bleeding and was admitted with melena which required endoscopic hemostasis (no transfusions needed).Three patients developed a symptomatic stricture requiring endoscopic dilation (either pneumatic or mechanical) and one of the patients required surgery for refractory stenosis.No perforations occurred in two groups.No further information has been obtained good faith efforts.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Literature source: marco spadaccini, et al."multi band mucosectomy for neoplasia in patients with barrett's esophagus: in vivo comparison between two different devices" (b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPTIVATOR EMR
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPE AND/OR ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key13861843
MDR Text Key287689840
Report Number3005099803-2022-01522
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K140726
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/23/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-