This is filed to report septum tear.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.It was noted leaflet restriction and prolapse in anterior and posterior.Visualization was difficult due to imaging quality and equipment.A steerable guide catheter (sgc) crossed the septum and was advanced to the mitral valve with resistance, and then a ntw clip delivery system (cds 10717r117) was advanced to the mitral valve.However, the clip could not capture both leaflets.Therefore.The cds was removed with the clip attached.The procedure continued with a longer clip.An xtw clip (10907r164) was successfully deployed in the a2/p2.However, capturing both leaflets was difficult.A second xtw clip (10907r140) was attempted to be implanted medial to the first clip to further reduce mr, but the septum was floppy and tore, causing an aorta hugger.Troubleshooting was performed but the clip was not coaxial and it was not possible to capture both leaflets.A decision was made to remove the clip.However, during removal, the clip became stuck in the sgc's tip and the clip opened.The clip was then pushed to the left atrium and re-closed.The clip was pulled into the inferior vena cava without inserting the clip into the sgc because the clip would open every time.However, the clip prematurely deployed from the cds into inferior vena cava.The clip was no longer attached to the gripper lines, and therefore the clip had to be snared and was removed.The torn septum was left untreated and the patient is stable.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to 1.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on available information, a cause of the reported resistance could not be determined.The reported tissue injury appears to be due to challenging anatomy.The reported patient effect of tissue injury as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|