Event summary: as reported, a universa firm ureteral stent set was placed in the patient because they had a ureteral stone.The patient had a follow up visit six months after stent placement and using ultrasound it was discovered that the stent was encrusted on both pigtails (kidney and bladder loops) and also on the stent body.The patient was not urinating well and was in pain and the stent was removed.The patient had to undergo a laser lithotripsy procedure to remove the encrustations from the stent with the laser.No section of the device remained inside the patient¿s body.No additional patient consequences were reported.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, and quality control procedures of the device were conducted during the investigation.The device was not returned for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.The device is provided with instructions for use which caution, ¿ureteral stents should be checked periodically for signs of encrustation and proper function.¿ the ifu lists occlusion, encrustation, and loss of renal function as potential adverse events associated with the use of the device.Based on the available information and a clinical assessment of the event, cook has concluded that a cause for this event could not be established.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|