• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (M

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (M Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/06/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial#: unknown, product type: extension, product id: neu_ ins_stimulator, serial#: unknown, product type: implantable neurostimulator.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: neu_unknown_ext, serial/lot #: unknown.Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Patricia krause, daniel kroneberg, doreen gruber, kristin koch, gerd-helge schneider, andrea a.Kühn.Long-term effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation in tardive dystonia: a follow-up of 5¿14 years.Journal of neurology.Doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-10965-8.Abstract introduction pallidal dbs is an established treatment for severe isolated dystonia.However, its use in disabling and treatment-refractory tardive syndromes (ts) including tardive dyskinesia and tardive dystonia (td) is less well investigated and long-term data remain sparse.This observational study evaluates long-term effects of deep brain stimulation (dbs) of the globus pallidus internus (gpi) in patients with medically refractory ts.Methods we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of seven td patients with bilateral gpi-dbs.Involuntary movements, dystonia and disability were rated at long-term follow-up (lt-fu) after a mean of 122±33.2 sd months (range 63¿171 months) and compared to baseline (bl), short-term (st-fu; mean 6±2.0 sd months) and 4-year follow-up (4y-fu; mean 45±12.3 sd months) using the abnormal involuntary movement scale (aims) and the burke¿fahn¿marsden dystonia rating scale (bfmdrs), respectively.Quality of life and mood were evaluated using the sf36 and beck depression index (bdi) questionnaires, respectively.Results at lt-fu patients had improved by 73%±14.2 sd in involuntary movements and 90%±1.0 sd in dystonia.Mood had improved significantly whereas quality of life remained unchanged compared to baseline.No serious long-lasting stimulation-related adverse events (aes) were observed.Three patients of this cohort presented without active stimulation and ongoing symptom relief at long-term follow-up after 3¿10 years of continuous dbs.Conclusion pallidal dbs is a safe and effective long-term td treatment.Even more interesting, three of our patients could stop stimulation after several years of dbs without serious relapse.Larger studies need to explore the phenomenon of ongoing symptom relief after dbs cessation.Reported events: it was reported that one patient implanted with pallidal dbs for severe isolated dystonia had their ins explanted 8 years after implantation due to symptoms remission.It was reported that one patient implanted with pallidal dbs for severe isolated dystonia required surgical intervention due to intolerable pain and tension alongside their lead wires.It was reported that one patient implanted with pallidal dbs for severe isolateddystonia had transient stimulation-related dysarthria and gait disturbances remitting after stimulation parameter adjustments.No long term side effects such as bradykinesia or gait disturbances were observed in the cohort.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the article or to match the reported event with any previously reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (M
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key13896176
MDR Text Key293154334
Report Number2182207-2022-00506
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/23/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/24/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-