The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.Based on the information reviewed, the reported difficult to advance appears to be related to procedural condition.The reported perforation of vessel (rupture of the femoral vein) appears to be related to difficult to advance.The hemorrhage was a result of the reported perforation of vessel.Additionally, hemorrhage and perforation of vessels are listed in the mitraclip instructions for use (ifu) as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The prolonged hospitalization and surgical intervention were a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|