Follow up report 001 (ref to natus complaint# (b)(4)).It was requested that the device be returned for evaluation.The camera is at least 12 years old and was discarded by the customer when they were advised there were no repair possibilities for it.There are no capa's related to this issue.This complaint does not identify a deficiency in the product design and therefore a capa is not required.Per (b)(4), complaint histories are reviewed routinely per quality system requirements and any complaint trends are assessed and documented as part of these reviews.Per (b)(4) hazard id line 5.22, severity 3-marginal, risk level low.A risk review is not required as this complaint does not describe a new failure mode or new harm and the existing hazard severity and/or probability of occurrence has not changed.A device history review is not applicable because, prior to the reported issue the device was in service for 2 or more years and a manufacturing defect is very unlikely.Udi number: not applicable.Faillure confirmed: no.Investigation result code: neuro sbu|product not returned.Closure rationale:complaint could not be verified, materials not returned for analysis.Low risk of harm or safety, individual complaint related to issue stated.No death or serious injury, considered a customer inconvenience.Complaints will be included in trending data for further review and investigation if needed.
|