• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BD RAPIS DIAGNOSTICS (SUZHOU) CO. LTD. BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR¿; CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BD RAPIS DIAGNOSTICS (SUZHOU) CO. LTD. BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR¿; CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 256089
Device Problem Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/11/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after testing, users discovered that an incorrect component was included in a bd rapid detection of sars-cov-2 veritor¿ kit.The test gave an error message and did not provide a result.There was no report of patient impact.Eua (b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: d2 lab tech used a flu bd cartridge causing an invalid error message result on the analyzer.Lab tech re-drip on a new cartridge again.Flu bd cartridge seems to be mixed up in this current bd batch.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation summary this statement is to summarize the investigation results regarding your complaint that alleges mixed product and invalid result when using kit rapid detection of sars-cov-2 veritor ce (material # 256089), batch number 1313612.Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate mixed product and invalid result complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples, if applicable.An investigation including reviewing all returned photographs were performed and concluded that the flu test was introduced during the pouching process of the sars kit.A capa 1448219 was opened to address this issue.The complaint was confirmed.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after testing, users discovered that an incorrect component was included in a bd rapid detection of sars-cov-2 veritor¿ kit.The test gave an error message and did not provide a result.There was no report of patient impact.(b)(4).The following information was provided by the initial reporter: d2 lab tech used a flu bd cartridge causing an invalid error message result on the analyzer.Lab tech re-drip on a new cartridge again.*flu bd cartridge seems to be mixed up in this current bd batch.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD RAPID DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VERITOR¿
Type of Device
CORONAVIRUS ANTIGEN DETECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BD RAPIS DIAGNOSTICS (SUZHOU) CO. LTD.
9 rui pu road export zone b
suzhou
CH 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BD RAPIS DIAGNOSTICS (SUZHOU) CO. LTD.
9 rui pu road export zone b
suzhou
CH  
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key13999441
MDR Text Key288705228
Report Number3006948883-2022-00102
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QKP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSN
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date09/10/2022
Device Catalogue Number256089
Device Lot Number1313612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/09/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-