H6: investigation conclusions: 22.H10: review of the device history records did not identify any manufacturing or processing related irregularities related to the screw shank geometry, tulip geometry, or other physical features.Qir reports indicate all inspected features were acceptable.Material certs were present from the supplier (in compliance with >135 ksi yield strength requirements for shank) along with all other cofc's.No other indications of misuse or heavy wear on the screw tulip exterior, interfacing helical flange threads, or hexalobe-screwdriver interface were observed during evaluation.Explanted shank is fractured through the neck and into the base of the shank sphere.Collateral surface damage noted on screw shank from improvised explantation.The contralateral s2a1 screw with noted set screw disassociation had no remarkable features that would suggest improper lockdown.Rod lock down marks on tulip bushing appeared symmetrical.No evidence of set screw cross threading.For screw fracture: device had been implanted for approximately 7 months at the time of revision/removal.Index surgery trajectory was identified by the rep as s2a1.Failure of the supporting (competitive) expandable interbody likely contributed to an adverse weight bearing load path for the original construct.This failure is consistent with screw failure expectations observed when used in loading conditions that exceed the design parameters set forth in mechanical performance testing.In this instance, the pedicle screw appears to have been exposed to fatigue stresses beyond the performance loads for which it was designed or intended.Other factors that may have contributed to complications and adverse reactions (i.E.Construct instability) would include the poor fusion development (non-union and/or pseudoarthrosis noted in patient history) and by the failure of the supporting interbody expandable.For set screw dislocation: it is reasonable to assume that the initial failure was the screw fracture identified above resulting in severe fixation instability propagating excess loads to other regions of the construct.This would cause atypical and excessive loads on the contralateral s2a1 screw resulting in the observed set screw disassociation.
|