• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ENDOSCOPIC CO2 REGULATION UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ENDOSCOPIC CO2 REGULATION UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number UCR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Shock (2072)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature article: "propensity score matching analysis to evaluate efficacy of polyethylene oxide adhesive on preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection" by yang yu, et al.  regardless of technical advancements, delayed bleeding is still a common adverse event after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd), often occurring in the early postoperative phase.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a newly designed polyethylene oxide (peo) adhesive for preventing delayed gastric bleeding.Patients who underwent gastric esd between december 2017 and december 2020 at three chinese institutions were retrospectively reviewed.Patients receiving peo application on gastric post-esd ulcers were included in the peo group, and patients without this procedure were included in the control group.To minimize potential bias, propensity score matching was performed, and sex, age, lesion size, lesion morphology, ulceration, localization, procedure time, frequency of major intraoperative bleeding, resected specimen size, lesion histopathology, submucosal invasion and the taking of antithrombotic drugs were included as matching factors.The incidence of delayed bleeding and time to bleeding were compared between both groups.After propensity score matching, 270 patients (135 per group) were included in the analysis.The delayed bleeding rate in the peo group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.5%, 2/135 vs.8.9%, 12/135, p= 0.006).The median time (range) to bleeding was 4.5 (4¿5) days in the peo group and 2 (1¿15) days in the control group, with no significant difference (p= 0.198).Peo demonstrated a significant effect in reducing the rate of delayed bleeding.Further study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of peo for bleeding that occurs in the early phase after gastric esd.Adverse events: n = 1 experienced haemorrhagic shock on pod1 with transient tachycardia and hypotension, and he also received a blood transfusion because of a decrease in haemoglobin from 101 to 62 g/l.After endoscopic haemostasis and conventional medical treatment, the patient¿s condition stabilized on the same day, and he was discharged on n = >14 - for patients with delayed bleeding, endoscopic haemostasis was successfully performed primarily with electrocoagulation for all bleeding sites.Metal clips were used as combined therapy for 5 lesions.Immediate haemostasis was achieved in all cases, and no re-bleeding events occurred later.N= 4: major intraoperative bleeding was arteriolar bleeding or diffuse venous bleeding in which haemorrhagic sites could not be located for the first time.The article includes 6 reports: patient identifier (b)(6) kd-650u, patient identifier (b)(6) gif-hq290, patient identifier (b)(6) ucr, patient identifier (b)(6) fd-411ur, patient identifier (b)(6) nm-200l-0423, patient identifier (b)(6) gif-q260j.This report is 3 of 6 for patient identifier (b)(6) ucr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is a supplemental report to correct the initial mdr.After receiving additional information from the author, the adverse events have been reviewed by the legal manufacturer and it has been determined the events are not a serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information from the author.New information added to b5.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the author: the author stated the olympus device did not cause or contribute to the adverse events reported.He also reported: the image blurring during the operation had nothing to do with our machine.The haemostatic powder used in the literature was sticky, which stuck to the ccd glass of our endoscope during esd surgery, causing temporary image blurring.These problems were determined by the haemostatic powder provided by other manufacturers.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOSCOPIC CO2 REGULATION UNIT
Type of Device
CO2 REGULATION UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key14103865
MDR Text Key294607430
Report Number8010047-2022-06215
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIF
UDI-Device Identifier04953170239113
UDI-Public04953170239113
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K081173
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUCR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/16/2022
Initial Date FDA Received04/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/22/2022
05/24/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/20/2022
06/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SERIAL/LOTS UNKNOWN: KD-650U,GIF-HQ290,FD-411UR,; SERIAL/LOTS UNKNOWN:NM-200L-0423,GIF-Q260J
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
-
-