The reported event (extraction of the device due to an infection) could be confirmed, since the x-rays provided for evaluation show the infection and the extraction of the device.This conclusion was verified by a medical expert upon review of the patient's case documentation and also by the r&d expert.Since the x-rays were provided, the opinion of the medical expert was requested and stated as following: "the x-rays show the 611afn in situ with a thin radiolucent zone around it's distal half adjacent to a sclerotic line of dense bone, means that there¿s defensive bone formation.Also, there is no more a proximal screws in situ (initially implanted with the nail) and there is clear bone formation in the proximal nail chokes.Moreover, the surgeon has made a bone window by temporarily removing a piece of the tibia, to be able to get access to the implant.This piece of bone has been put back in place.Furthermore, the surgeon has split the tibial bone (the line in the axis of the tibia) to make removal possible." the opinion of the r&d expert was requested and stated as following: "in relation to the drawing of the device, there is no area on the device that will promote bone regrowth but the absence of the proximal screws could promote bone regrowth." more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.The root cause could not be determined.However, based on the clinical opinion on the potential risk of infection caused by sterile packed stryker implants and instruments, ¿any kind of surgery bears the risk of infection.In trauma and orthopedic surgery with external or internal fixation implants or endoprostheses the infection risk varies between 0.5 % and 5 %, exceptionally up to 10 % and beyond, mainly depending on the respective surgical procedure and the typical patient population." a review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.H3 other text : device not returned.
|