• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORNIER S.A.S. 611 ANKLE FUSION NAIL RIGHT SIDE ANGLE 6 DIA. 10 LG. 180; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORNIER S.A.S. 611 ANKLE FUSION NAIL RIGHT SIDE ANGLE 6 DIA. 10 LG. 180; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LJU601
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 03/16/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results are not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when the analysis is complete.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the surgeon wanted to schedule a revision to remove the nail from the patient.The extraction kit specific to the nail was not available to be sent to the hospital so a universal extraction kit was ordered.The surgeon could not extract the screw and the design of the titanium nail with successive narrowing at the proximal level leads to bone regrowth, making ablation impossible.The patient's lower third of the tibia had to be cut for 14cm so the nail could be removed successfully.This revision surgery was related to an infection.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event (extraction of the device due to an infection) could be confirmed, since the x-rays provided for evaluation show the infection and the extraction of the device.This conclusion was verified by a medical expert upon review of the patient's case documentation and also by the r&d expert.Since the x-rays were provided, the opinion of the medical expert was requested and stated as following: "the x-rays show the 611afn in situ with a thin radiolucent zone around it's distal half adjacent to a sclerotic line of dense bone, means that there¿s defensive bone formation.Also, there is no more a proximal screws in situ (initially implanted with the nail) and there is clear bone formation in the proximal nail chokes.Moreover, the surgeon has made a bone window by temporarily removing a piece of the tibia, to be able to get access to the implant.This piece of bone has been put back in place.Furthermore, the surgeon has split the tibial bone (the line in the axis of the tibia) to make removal possible." the opinion of the r&d expert was requested and stated as following: "in relation to the drawing of the device, there is no area on the device that will promote bone regrowth but the absence of the proximal screws could promote bone regrowth." more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.The root cause could not be determined.However, based on the clinical opinion on the potential risk of infection caused by sterile packed stryker implants and instruments, ¿any kind of surgery bears the risk of infection.In trauma and orthopedic surgery with external or internal fixation implants or endoprostheses the infection risk varies between 0.5 % and 5 %, exceptionally up to 10 % and beyond, mainly depending on the respective surgical procedure and the typical patient population." a review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the surgeon wanted to schedule a revision to remove the nail from the patient.The extraction kit specific to the nail was not available to be sent to the hospital so a universal extraction kit was ordered.The surgeon could not extract the screw and the design of the titanium nail with successive narrowing at the proximal level leads to bone regrowth, making ablation impossible.The patient's lower third of the tibia had to be cut for 14cm so the nail could be removed successfully.This revision surgery was related to an infection.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
611 ANKLE FUSION NAIL RIGHT SIDE ANGLE 6 DIA. 10 LG. 180
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORNIER S.A.S.
161 rue lavoisier
montbonnot saint-martin 38330
FR  38330
Manufacturer (Section G)
TORNIER S.A.S.
161 rue lavoisier
montbonnot saint-martin 38330
FR   38330
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key14112180
MDR Text Key289287238
Report Number3000931034-2022-00154
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K130051
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/14/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2018
Device Catalogue NumberLJU601
Device Lot Number8353AM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-