As reported via the empower study, a (b)(6) female patient with no recorded medical history underwent stent-assisted coil embolization of an unruptured internal carotid artery (ica) on (b)(6) 2021 and experienced recurrence of right ica aneurysm at the neck on (b)(6) 2021.No action was taken.The event has not resolved.Per the principal investigator (pi), the event was mild in severity, possibly related to dual antiplatelet therapy and not likely related to the study device and study procedure.The saccular aneurysm had the following dimensions: maximum aneurysm diameter 3.81mm and neck width 3.18mm.The parent vessel diameter was 3.25mm.Stent-assisted coil embolization was successfully performed with the implantation of a 4mm x 23mm no tip enterprise¿ 2 vascular reconstruction device (encr402300 / 6000730) and unspecified coils.There were no reported intraoperative complications or study device deficiencies.Immediate post-procedure assessment showed raymond-roy score of class i: complete obliteration.Routine neurological examination performed prior to discharge on (b)(6) 2021 revealed hunt & hess grade 0 and modified rankin scale (mrs) score of 0.Digital subtraction angiography (dsa) performed at the 180-day (6-month) follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2021 showed raymond-roy score of class ii: residual neck (contrast filling in aneurysm neck but none in aneurysm body).There was no evidence of hemorrhage/rupture or in-stent stenosis/thrombosis.Additional information was received from the study team on (b)(6) 2022.The site confirmed that the recurrence was of the target aneurysm that was treated with the study device.No intervention/treatment was performed.
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Initial reporter name and address: the name, phone and email address of the initial reporter are not available / reported.[conclusion]: as reported via the empower study, a (b)(6) female patient with no recorded medical history underwent stent-assisted coil embolization of an unruptured internal carotid artery (ica) on (b)(6) 2021 and experienced recurrence of right ica aneurysm at the neck on (b)(6) 2021.No action was taken.The event has not resolved.Per the principal investigator (pi), the event was mild in severity, possibly related to dual antiplatelet therapy and not likely related to the study device and study procedure.The saccular aneurysm had the following dimensions: maximum aneurysm diameter 3.81mm and neck width 3.18mm.The parent vessel diameter was 3.25mm.Stent-assisted coil embolization was successfully performed with the implantation of a 4mm x 23mm no tip enterprise¿ 2 vascular reconstruction device (encr402300 / 6000730) and unspecified coils.There were no reported intraoperative complications or study device deficiencies.Immediate post-procedure assessment showed raymond-roy score of class i: complete obliteration.Routine neurological examination performed prior to discharge on (b)(6) 2021 revealed hunt & hess grade 0 and modified rankin scale (mrs) score of 0.Digital subtraction angiography (dsa) performed at the 180-day (6-month) follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2021 showed raymond-roy score of class ii: residual neck (contrast filling in aneurysm neck but none in aneurysm body).There was no evidence of hemorrhage/rupture or in-stent stenosis/thrombosis.Additional information was received from the study team on (b)(6) 2022.The site confirmed that the recurrence was of the target aneurysm that was treated with the study device.No intervention/treatment was performed.Based on complaint information, the device remains implanted and is thus not available for evaluation.Lake region medical performed a review of the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspection, and packaging of the lot 6000730.The history record indicates this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.The device will not be returned for analysis and therefore, no further investigation can be performed at this time.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As a result, we are closing this investigation.Aneurysm recanalization is a condition requiring additional intervention or retreatment or can be reasonably expected to result in medical or surgical intervention, including hospitalization.Furthermore, the relationship of the study device to the reported aneurysm recanalization cannot be excluded.Thus, the event is considered serious and mdr reportable.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr is to include the additional event information received on 08-jun-2022.[additional information]: modified information was received on 08-jun-2022.The information was reviewed.The adverse event term "recurrence of right internal carotid aneurysm at the neck¿ has been changed to "the right internal cervical aneurysm has recurred.¿ there is no new information that alters the previous file type determination, coding, and/or reportability determinations.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|