• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM (VIPERWIRE); PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE (GUIDEWIRE)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM (VIPERWIRE); PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE (GUIDEWIRE) Back to Search Results
Model Number VPR-GW-EL14
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 03/25/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The superficial femoral artery and popliteal were primary wired with a viperwire guide wire, and placement was confirmed on imaging.The treatment area was not tortuous but was highly calcified.One section of the vessel was treated with atherectomy.Thereafter, wire placement was checked and found to be in the desired location.The atherectomy device was advanced, and wire placement was again confirmed to be correct.Treatments were performed with a radial length orbital atherectomy device on low, medium, and high speed.Each treatment time was about 20-25 seconds, and rest time was equal to treatment time.During movement of the oad, the wire migrated into a small side vessel.Atherectomy was then performed in the popliteal vessel.The oad was removed, and wire position was checked on imaging.Placement at that time was observed to be less than ideal.The wire was pulled back, and imaging indicated the wire had fractured.The tip of the wire remained in the side vessel.The remainder of the wire was removed intact.Additional imaging confirmed the wire fragment was in a small side branch and not in the peroneal artery.The opinion of the physician was that the fragment would be "fine" where it was.The physician abandoned the fragment in vivo.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device analysis conclusion: the guidewire was received at csi for analysis.Visual examination confirmed the reported fracture.The distal section of the wire was not returned for analysis, which is consistent with details reported to csi.Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed evidence of fatigue with a large ductile tear and folding back onto the core wire.This evidence, along with the fracture location, is consistent with a fracture resulting from the driveshaft spinning too close to the spring tip.It is also possible there was a bend or kink near the spring tip.The root cause of the fracture is considered to be use not consistent with the instructions for use (ifu).The ifu warns, "never advance the orbiting crown to the point of contact with the guide wire spring tip.Distal spring tip detachment and embolization may result.Make sure there is a minimum of 10 cm between the guide wire spring tip and the distal end of the shaft." (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM (VIPERWIRE)
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE (GUIDEWIRE)
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
morgan hill
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key14186847
MDR Text Key289871626
Report Number3004742232-2022-00102
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier10852528005459
UDI-Public(01)10852528005459(17)231130(10)411232-1
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K190634
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/22/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2023
Device Model NumberVPR-GW-EL14
Device Catalogue Number7-10035-01
Device Lot Number411232-1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/29/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/06/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight78 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-