VENUSA DE MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. TACTICATH¿ QUARTZ CONTACT FORCE ABLATION CATHETER, 75MM; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number PN-004 075 |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Optical Problem (3001)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/18/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
During an atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation procedure, the catheter could be connected, catheter parameters are lost during the ablation process and pressure parameters did not display as expected.After cleaning, the pressure parameters were abnormal again, until they were completely lost.It was then noted that here was liquid backflow in the catheter connection the catheter was replaced and the procedure was completed with no consequences to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis; however, the log files from the tactisys quartz system were returned.The log file analysis concluded that the tacticath catheter performed as intended.The optical fibers met specifications, the recorded temperatures indicated cooling during rf ablation, and contact force measurements were displayed throughout the duration of the log files.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.The cause of the reported issue remains unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
One 75 mm tacticath quartz contact force ablation catheter was received for evaluation.A bend was noted in the distal shaft of the returned device between electrodes 3 and 4, and electrode ring 3 was dented and slightly distally displaced.Further investigation revealed conductor wire 3 was noted to be fractured at the proximal edge of electrode ring 3, with conductor wire 3 protruding out of the shaft material.This fracture is consistent with the displaced electrode ring 3.The cause of the bend in the catheter shaft and the displacement of electrode ring 3 remains unknown.In addition, the device did not meet specifications during a shaft leak test due to a break in the shaft material under electrode ring 3 at the location where conductor wire 3 was fractured and protruding.Fluid ingress was noted within the distal shaft proximal to electrode ring 3, but no ingress was noted between electrodes 1 and 2.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.The cause of the leak and fracture remain unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|