• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VERYAN MEDICAL LTD BIOMIMICS 3D VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VERYAN MEDICAL LTD BIOMIMICS 3D VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 144700-19
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Activation Failure (3270); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/05/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint investigation is ongoing.A detailed review of all the lot history records pertaining to the relevant stent and delivery system lots showed no issues that were deemed related to the complaint investigation.The device is returning for evaluation but has not yet been received.If further information regarding this event becomes available, or the investigation is concluded, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
On the (b)(6) 2022 a stent was being implanted using a contralateral approach to treat a lesion in the distal sfa.A 6fr sheath and 0.035" amplatz guidewire were used.The aortic bifurcation angle was reported as moderate but there were no device issues or resistance experienced while crossing the aortic bifurcation with the biomimics 3d delivery system.There was resistance reported during advancement of the delivery system to the target site and also during initiation of deployment of the stent.About 3-4cm of the stent was deployed before the physician decided to remove the delivery system and partially deployed stent.Upon removal of the device, the stent broke and a fragment remained in the patient's vessel.The physician was able to dilate the fragment of the stent remining in the vessel.A second non biomimics device was used.There was also resistance felt during advancement and deployment of this stent and it also fractured upon deployment.The patient was discharged with no issues.The patient was scheduled to come in for a follow-up appointment the next day, but did not make this appointment.The clinical site spoke with the patient and there are no consequences or impact to the patient reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A detailed review of all the lot history records pertaining to the relevant stent and delivery system lots showed no issues that were deemed related to the complaint investigation.The complaint investigation included an evaluation of the returned device and communication with the physician that was involved with the case.The additional information received from the site in response to questions from the complaints team highlighted that a contralateral approach was used.The vessel preparation included laser atherectomy and balloon angioplasty.A 6 french (fr) access sheath was used along with a 0.035" amplatz guidewire.A long chronic total occlusion (cto) was located between the origin of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) to the popliteal artery.There was a moderately tight aortic bifurcation.Resistance was experienced during advancement of the device and at initiation of the stent deployment and was probably linked to the moderate tortuosity of the vessels which were identified on the angiographic images.The ifu states "do not force passage if resistance is encountered at any time during delivery of the sds.This may cause damage to the stent, the sds, or vessel or may lead to partial deployment.If the stent cannot be deployed, remove the entire delivery system (a partially deployed stent may require surgical removal)".The stent partially deployed 3-4 cm although the physician reported that the bifurcation hub had been retracted to the proximal pin luer of the delivery system suggesting there was no stroke length remaining.The returned device showed no kinking or casting in the device and all bonds were in tact.There was significant elongation of the outer braid.The outer braid elongation is usually associated with high deployment forces.The elongation of the outer braid resulted in the partial deployment.A portion of the stent broke off during removal of the delivery system and remained in the vessel.This portion was was expanded using a balloon and the patient was dicharged.The complaint investigation was categorised as a "partial deployment and stent fracture type ii to type v".The cause category assigned was "anatomy".Section b.5 and section h have been updated to reflect he conclusions of the investigation.If any additional inofmration becaomes available a follow-up supplemental will be submitted.
 
Event Description
On the (b)(6) 2022 a stent was being implanted using a contralateral approach to treat a lesion in the distal sfa.A 6fr sheath and 0.035" amplatz guidewire were used.The aortic bifurcation angle was reported as moderate but there were no device issues or resistance experienced while crossing the aortic bifurcation with the biomimics 3d delivery system.There was resistance reported during advancement of the delivery system to the target site and also during initiation of deployment of the stent.About 3-4cm of the stent was deployed before the physician decided to remove the delivery system and partially deployed stent.Upon removal of the device, the stent broke and a fragment remained in the patient's vessel.The physician was able to dilate the fragment of the stent remaining in the vessel.The patient was discharged with no issues.The patient was scheduled to come in for a follow-up appointment the next day, but did not make this appointment.The clinical site spoke with the patient and there are no consequences or impact to the patient reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIOMIMICS 3D VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
BIOMIMICS 3D VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
VERYAN MEDICAL LTD
unit 11 galway technology park
parkmore road
galway city, H91 V E0H
EI  H91 VE0H
Manufacturer Contact
alan mcdonagh
unit 11 galway technology park
parkmore road
galway city, H91 V-E0H
EI   H91 VE0H
MDR Report Key14250998
MDR Text Key290458900
Report Number3011632150-2022-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
UDI-Device Identifier05391526850527
UDI-Public(01)05391526850527(17)230901(11)230131(10)0000129505
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P180003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/29/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/01/2023
Device Model Number144700-19
Device Catalogue Number144700-19
Device Lot Number0000129505
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-