• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 300 D
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 04/07/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
There is a plan to have the erbe equipment checked/evaluated at erbe usa.If any issues are found, a follow up report will be provided.No anomalies were found in device history record (dhr) of the involved device.Most likely, there were many factors involved in the event.At this time, no determination could be made as to the cause of the incident.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) during a colonoscopy to perform a polypectomy.The esu was used with a 13 mm boston snare.A description of the other accessories used in the procedure was not provided.The generator settings were as well as forced coag, effect 2, 20 watts and endocut q, settings 2, 1, and 6.Specifically, it was documented by the physician, dr.(b)(6), "during colonoscopy (i was doing the procedure), large polyp found on the hepatic flexure.Injected to lift polyp without issues.Once hot snare was used, the 'coag' pedal functioned appropriately but the 'cut' pedal did not.The tech was able to snare the polyp but it was done without the cut function.After the polyp was removed, a perforation was noted at the polypectomy site.This was successfully closed using clips, and the patient was admitted to the hospital for observation and antibiotics.This perforation likely occurred due to a device malfunction." no further information was provided in regards to the patient's condition.As a result of the incident, the medical center's clinical engineering department checked the unit.The esu passed their safety and performance test.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 300 D
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM  
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-9317
7709554400
MDR Report Key14288418
MDR Text Key290794731
Report Number9610614-2022-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K083452
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/05/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 300 D
Device Catalogue Number10140-100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-