• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 38MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 38MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74121138
Device Problem Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 01/20/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).Gani, m.H., zahoor, u., hanna, s.A., & scott, g.(2022).Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty provides excellent long-term survivorship and function in patients with a good-sized femoral head: results of a single, non-designer surgeon¿s cohort.Bone & joint open, 3(1), 68-76.Doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.Bjo-2021-0135.R1/15.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on literature review "metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty provides excellent long-term survivorship and function in patients with a good sized femoral head." 1 patient suffered femoral component loosening 13.83 years after a bhr and required a revision surgery.There's no more information available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that on literature review "metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty provides excellent long-term survivorship and function in patients with a good sized femoral head.", one patient suffered femoral component loosening 13.83 years after a bhr and required a revision surgery.No further information is available and the devices, used in treatment, were not available for analysis.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the femoral head.A review of historical complaints data was performed using part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects in a timeframe prior 12 months as of the complaint aware date.No other similar complaints have been identified for the part number and the reported failure mode.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions required.Without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images is required.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Based on the information provided we can confirm the reported complaint, however our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive patient weight, excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, trauma to the joint replacement.If additional information becomes available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.Internal complaint reference number: case-2022-00102911-1.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 38MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key14323142
MDR Text Key291289306
Report Number3005975929-2022-00243
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502766
UDI-Public3596010502766
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number74121138
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-2745-2015
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) CUP (UNKN TY)
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-