The reporter called to ask if coaguchek xs meter serial number (b)(4) needed to be recalibrated, was eligible for replacement and what the life expectancy of the meter was due to an "emergency event last month" when the patient¿s inr dropped very low.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient allegedly had a stroke.The result at the hospital on (b)(6) 2022 from an unknown laboratory method was 1.4 inr.On (b)(6) 2022, while the patient was still in the hospital the patient tested on his meter with a result of 1.6 inr.The result from the hospital laboratory was reportedly "close to that level" but the specific result was not provided.In the hospital, the patient's warfarin dose was reportedly increased slightly from 5 mg to 6.5 mg.The patient was reportedly in the hospital for 9 days.A blood clot was reportedly found on the right side of his brain by computed tomography (ct) scan.The patient allegedly had 4 ¿ 5 ct scans during his hospital stay.The patient was reportedly going to have surgery through his groin to take care of the clot, but allegedly that did not work.The patient was reportedly treated with a clot-busting drug.The reporter was not sure of the name of the drug, but thought it might be tissue plasminogen activator (tpa).The drug was reportedly successful in taking care of the clot.Neither the patient or the patient¿s doctor are sure what led to the stroke.The patient has reportedly never had issues with the meter results.The patient reportedly tested on the meter "a few days prior" to the stroke and his warfarin dose was not changed because the result was within his therapeutic range.The patient was allegedly taking 5 mg warfarin at that time.The patient stated he may have missed taking a dose of warfarin in the days prior to the stroke but he is not sure if he did.The patient had reportedly been eating differently (eating more steak) while traveling for a conference.The most recent meter result from the patient¿s logbook was reportedly 2.5 inr on (b)(6) 2022.The patient¿s therapeutic range is allegedly 2.5 ¿ 3.5 inr and the patient tests weekly.
|
Occupation is patient/consumer.The meter and test strips were requested for investigation.The meter was returned for investigation; the test strips were not returned.The meter was tested using retention strips and retention controls: testing results (qc range = 4.1 - 6.8 inr): qc 1: 5.3 inr, qc 2: 5.1 inr, qc 3: 5.1 inr.The obtained qc values were in the allowed range of the used combination strip lot - qc lot.All measurements were without error messages.The alleged results were not observed in the meter memory as the meter memory was erased by the patient prior to returning the device.On a regular basis, coaguchek strips of lots currently valid in the market are tested as part of routine retention testing and results have passed the internal inspection.Per product labeling, "coaguchek uses human recombinant thromboplastin.Therefore, the comparability to other human recombinant thromboplastins is best, whereas higher deviations can occur with other thromboplastins.However, those higher differences between thromboplastins of different (rabbit, bovine based) origin are not a coaguchek specific issue.Similar differences can be observed when a human recombinant thromboplastin-based laboratory method is compared against several other (rabbit, bovine-based) laboratory methods." the investigation did not identify a product problem.The cause of the event could not be determined.
|