Model Number 101-9812 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 04/14/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Event date: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's indirect decompression spacer implant had migrated and the patient experienced an increase in pre-existing pain in the low back and legs.Device migration was confirmed via x-ray imaging.The physician assessed that the device migration was due to the patient doing too much physical activity too soon after the implant procedure.Therefore, the patient underwent a revision procedure where the spacer was explanted and successfully replaced with a larger spacer.The patient was doing well post-operatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block b3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed no anomalies.However, a product labeling review identified that migration of the implant and new or worsened back or leg pain are known inherent risks with the use of lumbar spine implants.Additionally, the instructions for use (ifu) advises to avoid strenuous activity during the post-operative period.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patients indirect decompression spacer implant had migrated and the patient experienced an increase in pre-existing pain in the low back and legs.Device migration was confirmed via x-ray imaging.The physician assessed that the device migration was due to the patient doing too much physical activity too soon after the implant procedure.Therefore, the patient underwent a revision procedure where the spacer was explanted and successfully replaced with a larger spacer.The patient was doing well post-operatively.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|