The mayfield skull clamp was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - the dhr was reviewed and no anomalies related to the reported failure was observed.Failure analysis: the investigation of the returned device showed that the reported complaint was confirmed from the evaluation: evaluation found there was movement/play in the lock and the unit required replacement of worn parts due to routine use and wear.Root cause: evaluation found there was movement/play in the lock and the unit required replacement of worn parts due to routine use and wear.Additionally, improper or suboptimal positioning of the skull clamp on the patient can contribute to slippage of the head in the pins.No further investigation required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.
|