Us legal - it was reported that, after left hip bhr primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2014, the patient experienced a failed resurfacing procedure.This adverse event was treated with a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.During the revision, minimal synovial fluid was found with no evidence of metal debris.The femoral head was explanted, and the cup was retained.The patient was taken to the recovery room in stable and satisfactory condition.
|
H3, h6.It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the femoral head was performed using batch numbers to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects over the lifetime of the product and using part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects in a timeframe prior 12 months as of the complaint aware date.Other complaints were identified to involve this batch.Other similar complaints were identified for the part number and the reported failure mode.However, as the device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions required.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the noted ¿mild amount of synovitis¿ cannot be confirmed.Based on the revision notes provided it cannot be confirmed if mal performance of the device or another cause such as inflammation, trauma or overuse injury was the root cause.Or what was meant by ¿failed hip¿.It cannot be concluded the mild synovitis is associated with implant failure.The patient impact beyond the revision and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Based on the information provided we cannot confirm or further investigate the reported complaint, our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Additionally, specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault cannot be provided due to the insufficient information.If additional information becomes available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|