SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD FEMORAL HEAD 44MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 74123144 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Date 01/01/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that on literature review "hip resurfacing: a single surgeon u.S.Series with minimum ten-year follow-up¿ 2.2 years after a bhr surgery, one (1) patient developed subsidence of the femoral component due to femoral head collapse and pain.Revision surgery was performed to explant both implants.The patient outcome and current health status is unknown.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).Article cite: samuel, l.T., zuke, w.A., mahmood, s., munim, m.A., alamir, p.B., & brooks, p.J.(2022).Hip resurfacing: a single surgeon u.S.Series with minimum ten-year follow-up.The journal of arthroplasty, s0883-5403(22)00399-0.Advance online publication.Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Arth.2022.04.008.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported in a literature review that a bhr revision surgery was performed due to femoral head subsidence, collapse and pain.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment are not accessible for testing.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the femoral head.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints were identified for the femoral head.However, as the device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.As no device batch number was provided for investigation, manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the product and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions required.Without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation cannot be rendered nor can the root cause of the reported failure be determined.However, we cannot rule out the reported femoral head collapse, as a likely contributory factor.The impact to the patient beyond that which has already been reported cannot be confirmed nor concluded.Therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should any additional relevant clinical information be provided, this complaint would be re-assessed.Based on the information provided we cannot confirm or further investigate the reported complaint, our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Additionally, specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault cannot be provided due to the insufficient information.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|