• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER SEPTAL OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL OCCLUDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER SEPTAL OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL OCCLUDER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK AMPLATZER SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Arrhythmia (1721); Erosion (1750); Stroke/CVA (1770); Endocarditis (1834); Headache (1880)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The article, "comparison of anatomical features and postoperative clinical results of asd between two types of asd closure devices", was reviewed.This research article is a retrospective single center experience to analyze the postoperative clinical results between both devices and the anatomical features of each atrial septal defect in the hospital.Devices involved included amplatzer septal occluder (aso) and figulla flex ii septal occluder (fso).The article concluded that asos were placed in posterior rim defect cases and fsos in aortic-superior rim defect, septal m malalignment, and extensive rim defect cases, but there were no differences in patient characteristics or treatment efficacy and safety outcomes between the two devices.[the author of this article is kotaro miura, md, department of cardiology, keio university hospital, 35 shinanomachi, shinjuku-ku, tokyo 160-8582].
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported in a research article, 214 patients underwent percutaneous asd closures between october 2014 and february 2020; the devices associated with this study were amplatzer septal occluder (aso) and figulla flex ii septal occluder (fso).There were no differences in the clinical performance of death, erosion, dropout, stroke, infective endocarditis, new-onset supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, new-onset migraine, and residual shunting between the two groups.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review, and no device or additional patient information was received for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.H6 medical device problem code 4001 removed and 2993 was added.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMPLATZER SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Type of Device
TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG# 2135147
5050 nathan ln n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key14464885
MDR Text Key293650048
Report Number2135147-2022-00306
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P000039
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK AMPLATZER SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/25/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/21/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/23/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
-
-