As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 08/2023).
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not returned for evaluation.However, two electronic photos were provided for review.The photos shows one equistream split tip catheter implanted in a patient body.Suture was noted on the bifurcation and at the insertion site.Clamps were noted on both the extension legs.The arterial extension leg of the catheter was found to be crimped.Blood like fluid was noted inside the arterial extension leg in the second photo.However, the extension leg appeared kinked at the same point.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported deformation issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4(expiry date: 08/2023).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
|