As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 03/2023).
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, two electronic photos were provided for review.The photos shows the partial view of the extension legs of one equistream split tip catheter.Kink was noted on both the extension legs near the clamping area.Blood like fluid was noted inside the arterial extension leg in the second photo.However, the extension legs appeared kinked at the same point.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported deformation issue.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported obstruction issue as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 03/2023), g3.H11: e1, e3, h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
It was reported that approximately three months and twenty one days post port placement procedure, the port allegedly had deformation in both ways that impeded the flow.Reportedly, the device was removed from the patient and the procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|