|
Model Number 8884711253 |
Device Problems
Use of Device Problem (1670); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Pneumothorax (2012)
|
Event Date 04/08/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An investigation is currently underway.Upon completion, the results will be forwarded.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer stated that they have a 2-step verification process of x-rays for inserting a nasogastric (ng) tube, the doctor only performed one of the x-rays and the ng tube perforated the lung.The patient in question got covid and then covid pneumonia and died.The patient also had many co-morbidities.The customer wants to work with cardinal health to make this a safer process by putting alert stickers on the packaging to refer to hospital protocol before insertion.She further stated that there was no dfu in the package.Per customer, the direction for activating the polymer was not noticeable.The customer is not holding cardinal health accountable and according to the customer, it is a doctor insertion issue.Additional information was received from the customer and stated that on 08-apr-2022, the patient required a pigtail chest tube inserted, because of the right tension pneumothorax that was seen on chest x-ray after the ng (ko) tube insertion.On 10-apr-2022, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (icu) because of tachypnea, increased work of breathing and decreased level of consciousness (loc), required optiflow.Per customer, the pigtail chest tube remained in until (b)(6) 2022.The patient was already back on the ward and deteriorated again on (b)(6) 2022, due to potential aspiration pneumonia (new hypoxia, fever, and tachycardia).The patient died on (b)(6) 2022.The death certificate states that immediate cause of death as complications of blunt trauma, antecedent fall down the stair.The other significant conditions listed was covid-19, pneumonia.Per customer, the death certificate was signed by the coroner and no autopsy held.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Since a lot number was not provided, the device history record review could not be performed.As part of our manufacturing process, all device history records are reviewed and approved by quality, prior to release of product.Three (3) pictures were provided for the analysis.The pictures provided were stated as representative to the product code that was used during the incident reported.Upon reviewing the pictures, the instructions for activating the hydromer can be seen on the polybag "activate hydromer coating prior to style removal".A gemba walk was performed, and manufacturing process was reviewed, all process and controls were found properly followed, including sub-assemblies, finished product assembly, packaging and inspections performed to the product.In addition, quality control (qc) inspections are performed to the product for material release; and production personnel performs a 100% visual inspection during the packaging process, to detect and discard any identified issues.Based on the review performed, one (1) ifu is included per case (10 units) as per procedure.A physical sample was not received for the investigation.Per customer, the sample was discarded.Because a sample was not returned, we were unable to perform a follow up investigation to include functional and visual evaluations to confirm the issue and root cause analysis.At this time, a corrective and preventive action is not deemed necessary.The current process is running according to product specifications, meeting all quality acceptance criteria.We will keep monitoring the process for any adverse trends that require immediate attention.This complaint will be used for qa tracking and trending purposes.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|