• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CABLE; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CABLE; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Incorrect Measurement (1383)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/09/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
One flotac sensor was received by product evaluation laboratory for a full examination.The report of pressure readings issue was unable to be confirmed.Both flotrac and dpt sensors of the flotrac unit zeroed and sensed pressure accurately on ev1000 and pressure monitor.No error message was noticed on the monitors.During output drift testing of bots sensors of the flotrac units, pressure did not show any drift during output drift testing and met specifications.Electrical testing showed that both input impedance and output impedance for both sensors were within specifications.Zero-offset for both sensors also met specifications.No leakage or occlusion was detected from the kit during pressure test.No visible damage was observed from the kit.The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Event Description
As reported, during use in patient, with this flotrac sensor connected to an ev1000 system, there was a difference of 20 mmhg with the systolic blood pressure (sbp) values compare to the ones displayed at the bedside monitor.The exact value displayed and the expected value according the patient status were not available.No error message nor alarm were displayed.The flotrac sensor was changed, however the sbp continued being low.Then, the cables of the ev1000a and the bedside monitors were reconnected and the issue was solved.The patient was not treated according to the wrong values displayed.There was no allegation of patient injury.Patient demographics unable to be obtained.The device was available for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Initially, this event was reported against a flotrac sensor that was received for evaluation and tested on 1st june without any failure found.As per customer clarification on the follow up, the issue remained when exchanging the flotrac for a new one.The problem was solved replacing the flotrac cable and bedside monitor cable.Based on this information and on the flotrac evaluation results, this file has been updated from flotrac to cable unknown.Additionally the event description has been updated as follows: as reported, during use in patient of this ev1000platform using a flotrac cable and a bedside monitor cable, there was a difference of 20 mmhg with the systolic blood pressure (sbp) values compare to the ones displayed at the general electric monitor.The exact value displayed and the expected according to the patient status were not available.No error message nor alarm were displayed.The flotrac sensor was changed without success.Replacing the flotrac cable and bedside monitor cable the issue was solved.The patient was not treated according to the wrong values displayed.There was no allegation of patient injury.Cables had been discarded and it was not possible to clarify if they did not work or there was loose or incorrect connection.Flotrac sensor was sent for evaluation even though as per troubleshooting the issue was likely related to the cables.Device related fields, 510k reference, manufacturer information and investigation codes were updated in in their respective fields.It was further informed that the cables were not available for evaluation since they were discarded at hospital.Without return of the product, edwards is unable to perform a complete investigation of the reported event.It is not possible to determine what factors may have contributed to it, and therefore no actions could be planned.The lot number for this device was not supplied; therefore, further review of the related manufacturing records could not be performed.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CABLE
Type of Device
COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key14590054
MDR Text Key298986951
Report Number2015691-2022-06006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K191089
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/03/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/27/2023
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN
Device Catalogue NumberMHD6
Device Lot Number64066658
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/23/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-