• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX US CAROTID SYST; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX US CAROTID SYST; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number PC1040RXC
Device Problems Material Frayed (1262); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/24/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported, the precise pro rx could not be deployed after pre-dilation and being delivered to the lesion.It was noted that it was hard to pull the valve.The physician that s/he forgot to open the valve; however, it was noted to be open.The case was completed with new precise (10-30).There was no reported injury to the patient.The device was stored and prepped per the ifu.There was nothing unusual noted about the stent delivery system prior to use.The stent was still constrained within the outer member/sheath when it was removed from the tray.There was no difficulty encountered when flushing the stopcock.There was no difficulty while flushing the sds.The intending procedure was a carotid artery stenting (cas).The intended lesion was at the bifurcation.A non-cordis 8f guiding catheter was used.There was no difficulty encountered while advancing the sds towards the lesion.Unusual force was not used during the procedure.No difficulty or resistance was experienced when crossing the lesion.The sds did not pass through any previously places stent.The new stent was deployed without any issues.The device will be returned for analysis.Addendum due to pe findings: added code catheter tip-frayed/split/torn.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The precise pro rx could not be deployed after pre-dilation and being delivered to the lesion.It was noted that it was hard to pull the valve.The physician that s/he forgot to open the valve; however, it was noted to be open.The case was completed with new precise (10-30).The device was stored and prepped per the ifu.There was nothing unusual noted about the stent delivery system prior to use.The stent was still constrained within the outer member/sheath when it was removed from the tray.There was no difficulty encountered when flushing the stopcock.There was no difficulty while flushing the sds.The intending procedure was a carotid artery stenting (cas).The intended lesion was at the bifurcation.A non-cordis 8f guiding catheter was used.There was no difficulty encountered while advancing the sds towards the lesion.Unusual force was not used during the procedure.No difficulty or resistance was experienced when crossing the lesion.The sds did not pass through any previously places stent.The new stent was deployed without any issues.There was no reported injury to the patient.The device was returned for analysis.One non-sterile pc1040rxc precise pro rx us carotid syst was received for analysis inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, the stent of the unit was received in place, not deployed.The distal tip of the unit was observed over cannulated into the brite tip.The brite tip was observed frayed/ split/ torn damaged.Also, the body shaft of the unit was found separated at the valve and id band area.Besides, the polyamide body shaft was observed kinked damaged, and the valve of the unit was received partially locked.Likewise, the pusher rod was received fully inserted into the body sheath.No other anomalies observed on the unit at a naked eye.Dimensional analysis to measure the stroke length and usable length of the stent delivery system could not be performed due to the separated and damaged condition of the unit the way it was returned for evaluation.Stent deployment functional test was not performed on the unit due to the separated and damaged condition of the unit the way it was returned for evaluation.Per microscopic analysis, the precise pro body shaft separation was observed under the vision system and the separated section of the unit presented elongations and frayed edges.These characteristics are clear evidence on the product in which during analysis of the device, it was noted that an application of tension (force) induced the separation.Also, the kink found on the body shaft of the unit was magnified.No other issues were noted during the microscopic analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 18061164 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿stent delivery system (sds)-ses-deployment difficulty ¿ unable¿ was confirmed since the stent of the unit was received in place, not deployed.Nonetheless, the body shaft of the unit was found kinked and separated, as well as the distal tip of the unit was observed over cannulated into the brite tip, causing, in turn, the observed frayed/ split/ torn damaged condition on the brite tip.Therefore, the reported ¿catheter tip-frayed/split/torn" was indeed confirmed.Furthermore, the body shaft separated section of the unit presented elongations and frayed edges, probably caused by an application of a tension force (users¿ interaction with the device during use).The application of tension may have induced the separation of the unit as this was the returned condition noted on the unit for evaluation.However, neither the cause of the separated and damaged condition on the unit, nor the cause of the reported deployment difficulty could be determined during the device evaluation.Procedural and or handling factors such as vessel characteristics and the user¿s interaction with the device during use might have contributed to the damaged conditions on the unit.According to the instructions for use (ifu) ¿preparation of stent delivery system: caution: the stent delivery system is shipped with the tuohy borst valve open.Be careful not to prematurely deploy the stent during preparation.Prep the device in the tray per instructions below.Close the tuohy borst valve prior to removing the device from the tray.¿ additionally, the instructions for use (ifu) states ¿note: if resistance is met during delivery system introduction, the system should be withdrawn and another system should be used.¿ neither the phr review, nor the product analysis suggests that the reported events could be related to the manufacturing process of the unit.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions will be taken.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISE PRO RX US CAROTID SYST
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes, FL 33014
7863138372
MDR Report Key14601170
MDR Text Key294137031
Report Number9616099-2022-05685
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier20705032036556
UDI-Public(01)20705032036556(17)230930(10)18061164
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P030047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/06/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2023
Device Model NumberPC1040RXC
Device Catalogue NumberPC1040RXC
Device Lot Number18061164
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/11/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/15/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
8F OPTIMO GUIDE CATH; PRECISE (10-30)
-
-