• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN ABRE VENOUS SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; STENT, ILIAC VEIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN ABRE VENOUS SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; STENT, ILIAC VEIN Back to Search Results
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Arrhythmia (1721); Chest Pain (1776); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/19/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a physician was attempting to use a abre self-expanding stent to treat a lesion in a patient.The lumen flushed prior to use and the device was prepped as per ifu.It was reported that the patient's proximal/distal measurements in healthy tissue had measured 18mm.The physician pre-dilated with 10mm balloon and the patient experienced extreme back pain.The physician decided to go with a 14mm stent.No issues until patient went to emergency room with chest pain and palpitations.The stent migrated to upper ivc/superior portion of right atrium.Treatment was required; to remove the stent, they first tried inflating 14mm balloon to drag the stent back from the atrium.This was unsuccessful so they tried using a gooseneck snare which did not work either.They then tried a 16mm balloon which did not work.They were able to pull it out through a 7fr sheath using the snares used to retrieve ivc filters.No further patient injury was reported for this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received reported that the patient presented with lower extremity swelling and pain causing significant impact on qol (¿quality of life¿).No clinical hx of dvt and no prior intervention (including superficial venous treatment).A nivl was confirmed on ivus with 61% stenosis and vein scarring noted.Lesion location and location of stent placement civ to cfv.Patient was hydrated.The physician measures the vein for reference diameter in ipsilateral vein proximal and distal to the lesion.The physician undersized this stent since the patient had significant pain with pre-dilation.Ipsilateral ivus measurements - cfv 10.6-13.6, eiv 12.0-15.4, civ 12.4-18.9.The physician typically uses ivus and determines treated when there is >60% stenosis without wounds and >50% stenosis with wounds.The physician measured 61-65% stenosis on ivus with vein ¿scarred¿ in area of stenosis.Pre-dil with 10mm balloon (patient experienced backpain ¿ this dictated the size of stent because the physician was worried about patient pain); post-dilation of the 14x120 stent was performed with a 12x60 mm balloon.Nothing unusual noted during delivery of the stent, no excessive force used.Plavix 75mg/day for 3 months was given.Ultrasound planned in 1-2 weeks.The leg edema and pain resolved within 3 mos.The patient had presented to the er with palpitations and chest pain and cta demonstrated the stent bridging the ivc to the ra.Stent migrated to upper ivc/ superior portion of right atrium with alleged onset of symptoms one week prior.Stent was removed within 24 hours of presented to hospital.Physician tried multiple attempts with balloon (14mm and then 16mm dimeter) and gooseneck snare to retrieve stent by dragging back from atrium unsuccessfully.Ir was able to use ivc filter snare to pull stent into 7fr sheath and remove safely.The patient is alive and continues to do well.Implanting physician also noted that he re-evaluated her compression and it is no longer be present.Physician performed a duplex us following stent retrieval and noted the reflux in the cfv and popliteal was gone.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ABRE VENOUS SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, ILIAC VEIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14618551
MDR Text Key293446195
Report Number2183870-2022-00196
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QAN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P200026
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/07/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-0464-2022
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-