• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Edema (2020); Ventricular Fibrillation (2130); Heart Block (4444)
Event Date 01/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: elewa, ahmad g., et al.¿comparison between local abnormal ventricular activities (lava) elimination vs.Scar-dechanneling as two substrate-based approaches for ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.¿ vol.Vol12, no.Issue05, 2021.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: elewa, ahmad g., et al.¿comparison between local abnormal ventricular activities (lava) elimination vs.Scar-dechanneling as two substrate-based approaches for ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.¿ vol.Vol12, no.Issue05, 2021.Objective/methods/study data: background: substrate-based approaches for ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (vt) can help overcome the challenges of conventional mapping techniques particularly in vt storm patients.Objective: we aimed to compare the outcomes of scar dechanneling vs.Local abnormal ventricular activity (lava) elimination for ablation in our patient cohort who were predominantly presenting with vt storm.Methods and results: in our prospective observational study, we have enrolled 30 consecutive patients (mean age 58.13 years) with scar related vt (90% had vt storm).We used either the scar dechanneling (in 14 patients) or the lava elimination (in 16 patients) method.No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the median procedure duration (192 vs 157 minutes in the lava and dechanneling groups respectively, p value 0.142), the median number of ablation points (74 points in each group, p value 0.93) or the acute procedural success rate (87.5% and 78.5% in the lava and dechanneling groups respectively, p value 0.642).At 12 months follow up, the overall recurrence rate was comparable in both groups (62.5% and 50% in the lava and dechanneling groups respectively, p value 0.491).Vt storm recurrence was 12.5% in the lava group compared to 35.5% in the dechanneling group (p value 0.404), a relatively good figure considering that at baseline 90% of patients had vt storm.Conclusion: lava elimination and scar dechanneling are two comparable methods regarding efficacy and safety in ablation of scar-related vt.Both have been associated with high acute success rates in vt storm patients.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events: irrigated 3.5-mm tip ablation catheter thermocool, navistar.Other biosense webster concomitant devices that were also used in this study: a quadripolar biosense webster.Carto 3 system version 6.Non-biosense webster concomitant devices that were also used in this study: a quadripolar st.Jude medical.At.Jude ep lab system (workmate claris.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions: (2) patients developed vf requiring immediate defibrillation.(1) pulmonary edema.(1) heart block due to ablation near the his region.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
646591-798
MDR Report Key14640850
MDR Text Key293852109
Report Number2029046-2022-01237
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEG
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CARTO 3 SYSTEM VERSION 6; QUADRIPOLAR BIOSENSE WEBSTER; QUADRIPOLAR ST. JUDE MEDICAL; ST. JUDE EP LAB SYSTEM (WORKMATE CLARIS
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-