• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG UNKN. POLARSTEM CEMENTED; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG UNKN. POLARSTEM CEMENTED; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 07/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, on literature review "ten-year follow-up of a cemented tapered stem", two (2) patients initially underwent thr primary implantation of a cemented polarstem and one of the following smith and nephew acetabular cup combinations: ep-fit cup, cemented polyethylene mueller cup or cementless anti-luxation mueller cup.After this procedure, these patients required the revision of all the hip prosthesis components due to an unspecified postoperative infection at sixteen (16) and seventeen (17) months after implantation, respectively.The outcome of both patients is not known.No further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).Klasan, a., sen, a., dworschak, p., el-zayat, b.F., ruchholtz, s., schuettler, k.F.,.& heyse, t.J.(2018).Ten-year follow-up of a cemented tapered stem.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 138(9), 1317-1322.Doi: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00402-018-3002-1.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The study of a.Klasan a.Et.Al.[1] reports "ten-year follow-up of a cemented tapered stem.It was reported that two (2) patients initially underwent thr primary implantation of a cemented polarstem and one of the following smith and nephew acetabular cup combinations: ep-fit cup, cemented polyethylene mueller cup or cementless anti-luxation mueller cup.After this procedure, these patients required the revision of all the hip prosthesis components due to an unspecified postoperative infection at sixteen (16) and seventeen (17) months after implantation, respectively.The outcome of both patients is not known.No further information is available.As this is a literature complaint, the devices used in treatment, were not returned for investigation.The part and the batch number are not known.Therefore, it is not possible to investigate whether the reported device met manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.As no device was received for investigation, a visual inspection could not be performed.A complaint history review was performed.The occurrence of the reported failure mode is within its expected risk level as per risk management.Review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode and severity of the reported issue.The instructions for use lists several possible adverse effects resulting from a hip arthroplasty.A medical investigation was conducted.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images is required.Without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.Based on the conducted investigation the failure mode and the relationship between the device and the reported event cannot be confirmed.Due to insufficient information it is not possible to speculate about factors which could have contributed to the reported event.No probable cause can be determined.To date, no further actions will be taken.Should additional information become available, this complaint will be reassessed.Smith and nephew will monitor the devices for further similar issues.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).[1] klasan, a., sen, a., dworschak, p.Et al.Ten-year follow-up of a cemented tapered stem.Arch orthop trauma surg 138, 1317¿1322 (2018).Https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00402-018-3002-1.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN. POLARSTEM CEMENTED
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau TN CH-50 00
SZ  CH-5000
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau TN CH-50 00
SZ   CH-5000
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key14718951
MDR Text Key294928311
Report Number9613369-2022-00304
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/16/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
-
-