It was reported that during an shoulder surgery, the firstpass suture passer got stuck onto utilizing it for the first time during the case, it was tried to pass the suture, but the needle seemed to snap out of the device.The jaw also broke and was loose.The procedure was successfully completed with a non-significant delay using a back-up device.No further complications were reported.
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H10 h3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.Insufficient product identification information was provided and thus a manufacturing record review could not be conducted.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states this case reports, the breakage of the firstpass suture device during first time use.Reportedly, an attempt was made to pass the suture through the needle which resulted in the needle snapping out of the device and ¿the jaw also broke and was loose.¿ it was communicated per case correspondence, the lot number provided for the device in question was actually a fastfix device (72202468) and not a firstpass st.No response to request for clarification of the lot number was received.It has not been reported whether broken device ¿jaw¿ or the snapped needle was retrieved from the patient.No clinically relevant supporting documentation was provided for review.Based on the limited information provided the root cause of the breakage could not be determined.The firstpass st devices are manufactured and intended as externally communicating devices and are not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible micro-motion and/or migration, and local irritation/discomfort cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.There was no relationship found between the device and the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: 1) excessive force.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H1: type of reportable event updated.
|