• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; SIMILAR DEVICE D132701, PMA # P030031/S053

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; SIMILAR DEVICE D132701, PMA # P030031/S053 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SMARTTCH BIDIRECT
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 11/25/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: akhtar t, wallace r, daimee ua, sivasambu b, hart e, yang e, marine je, berger r, calkins h, spragg d.Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a real-world evidence.Indian pacing electrophysiol j.2022 jan-feb;22(1):24-29.Doi: 10.1016/j.Ipej.2021.11.006.Epub 2021 nov 25.Pmid: 34838748; pmcid: pmc8811282.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was not provided by the customer.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: akhtar t, wallace r, daimee ua, sivasambu b, hart e, yang e, marine je, berger r, calkins h, spragg d.Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a real-world evidence.Indian pacing electrophysiol j.2022 jan-feb;22(1):24-29.Doi: 10.1016/j.Ipej.2021.11.006.Epub 2021 nov 25.Pmid: 34838748; pmcid: pmc8811282.Objective/methods/study data: background: there are limited data describing the experience of radiofrequency (rf) vs.Cryoballoon (cb) ablation for atrial fibrillation (af) among elderly patients in the united states.Methods: we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients 75 years of age undergoing index rf vs.Cb ablation between january 2014 and may 2020 at our center.The choice of ablation technique was left to the operator's discretion.Major complications and efficacy, defined as freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ata) lasting 30 s after one year of follow-up, were assessed in patients with index rf vs.Cb ablation.Results: in our cohort of 186 patients, the median age was 78 (76e81) years, 54.8% were men, and 39.2% had persistent af.The median cha2ds2-vasc score was 4 (3e4), while the median duration of af was 3 (1e7) years.The majority (n ¼ 112, 60.2%) underwent rf ablation.The median procedure time was significantly lower in cb group (197 vs 226.5 min, p¼<0.01).The incidence of complications was similar in the two sub-groups (rf: 1.8% vs.Cb: 2.7%, p ¼ 0.67).Similarly, arrhythmia-free survival rate on antiarrhythmic drugs at 1-year follow-up remained statistically comparable (63.4% vs.68.9%, p ¼ 0.33) between patients receiving rf vs.Cb ablation.Conclusion: the safety and efficacy of rf vs.Cb ablation for af remained comparable in our cohort of patients older than 75 years.Cb ablation was associated with a shorter procedure time.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events: thermocool smarttouch, biosense-webster: other biosense webster concomitant devices that were also used in this study: lasso, pentaray mapping catheter (biosense-webster, diamond bar, california), carto system.Non-biosense webster concomitant devices that were also used in this study: arctic front advance, medtronic.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions: 1 patient suffered cardiac tamponade.1 patient suffered pericardial effusion.Both patients required prolonged hospitalization.There was no mention of medical interventions provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER
Type of Device
SIMILAR DEVICE D132701, PMA # P030031/S053
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
646591-798
MDR Report Key14728833
MDR Text Key294281202
Report Number2029046-2022-01361
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030031/S053
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SMARTTCH BIDIRECT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ARCTIC FRONT ADVANCE, MEDTRONIC; CARTO SYSTEM; LASSO; PENTARAY MAPPING CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-