• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS TRANSFEMORAL BALLOON; BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS TRANSFEMORAL BALLOON; BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 9350BC20JP
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Heart Block (4444)
Event Date 05/19/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Before valve deployment, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed with a 20 mm edwards transfemoral balloon catheter.Immediately after bav, complete atrioventricular block (cavb) temporarily developed.During a transfemoral tavr for the native aortic position, a 23mm sapien 3 valve was deployed between 80:20 and 90:10 aortic/ventricular position with 2ml less contrast solution than nominal volume as intended.The deployment position was satisfactory.Although cavb was temporarily noted immediately after valve deployment, the patient had first degree av block in the subsequent course after an e-sheath removal.A temporary pacemaker was removed on postoperative day one.On the early morning of post op day two, cavb developed and a temporary pacemaker was inserted again.Because the patient was pacing-dependent during sleep, a permanent pacemaker implantation was performed on post op day five.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use (ifu), conduction system defects (heart block), arrhythmias and conduction system defects that may require a permanent pacemaker are potential adverse events associated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty, bioprosthetic heart valves, and the thv procedure.According to the valve academic research consortium (varc) guidelines, the close anatomical relationship between the aortic valve complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle may explain these complications of the thv procedure.According to the literature review, and as documented in a clinical technical summary written by edwards lifesciences , atrioventricular conduction disturbances after thv are associated with many patient-related and procedural related factors, including pre-operative co-morbid status, the degree, and bulkiness of aortic valve and annular calcification, inter-ventricular septal thickness, pre-existing electrocardiogram abnormalities, the depth of prosthesis implantation, and the profile of the implanted prosthesis.Unlike conventional avr, where there may be localized trauma due to decalcification of the annulus and/or suture placement in the proximity of the av node or the bundles, thv may cause conduction abnormalities through mechanical impingement of the conduction system by the prosthesis.The mechanisms of the development of heart block after thv are well documented and described in the literature.It is also documented that pre-existing heart block is common in patients undergoing thv or surgical avr and another 4-6 % will develop postoperative heart block, potentially requiring a permanent pacemaker.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results are inconclusive as patient and procedural factors were not provided; however, the event could be related to the mechanisms described above.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.Device was discarded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS TRANSFEMORAL BALLOON
Type of Device
BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key14738498
MDR Text Key294938374
Report Number2015691-2022-06251
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OZT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103195088
UDI-Public(01)00690103195088(17)231119(10)64096793
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K140241
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/19/2023
Device Model Number9350BC20JP
Device Lot Number64096793
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/24/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/22/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight55 KG
-
-